Revisiting the Book of Esther: Assessing the Historical Significance of the Masoretic Version for the Achaemenian History

Document Type : Original Research Article


Department of History, Faculty of Literature and Human Science, University of Tehran


Most modern scholars consider the Book of Esther to be a kind of historical novel; hence, the historicity of many of its characters and events is highly debatable. While the present study does not intend to defend the historicity of the book, it does review it again by using sources that have received less attention in this regard. That the Book of Esther has a lot of Persian realia in it is not news, but most scholars have debated its historical value by comparing the book with classical sources. However, the present article aims to show how a significant part of the historical material of the Book of Esther is in line with evidence that if not all, but most of the classical sources are unaware of, and accepting this fact means that the author of the Masoretic Esther had direct or indirect access to sources associated with the Persian state. In order to prove this issue, using the descriptive-analytical method based on library studies, the primary focus of this article has been on sources other than the Greek ones, mainly Achaemenian royal inscriptions, and economic and legal documents found in different parts of the Persian Empire.


Main Subjects

🔓 © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Tissaphernes Archaeological Research Group, Tehran, Iran. Open Access. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriv- atives License (, which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The ethical policy of Persica Antiqua is based on the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines and complies with International Committee of Persica Antiqua Editorial Board codes of conduct. Readers, authors, reviewers and editors should follow these ethical policies once working with Persica Antiqua. The ethical policy of Persica Antiqua is liable to determine which of the typical research papers or articles submitted to the journal should be published in the concerned issue. For information on this matter in publishing and ethical guidelines please visit

Bergey, Ron. (1984). “Late Linguistic Features in Esther”. The Jewish Quarterly Review 75(1):66-78.
Bickerman, Elias. (1985). Four Strange Books of the Bible: Jonah, Daniel, Koheleth, Esther, Berlin: Schocken. 
Briant, Pierre. (1996). Histoire De L’Empire Perse de Cyrus à Alexandre Vol I, Leiden: Nederlands Instituut Voor Het Nabije Oosten. 
Cowley, Arthur Ernest. (1923). Aramaic papyri of the fifth century B.C, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Dandamayev, M. A. (1994). “Achaemenid Mesopotamia: Traditions and Innovations”. In: Sancisi-Weerdenburg Hellen, Kuhrt Amelie and Cool Root Margaret (ed). Achaemenid History VIII: Continuity and Change, Proceedings of the last Achaemenid History Workshop, Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten. 231-232.
De Troyer, Kristin. (2000). “Once more, the so-called Esther fragments of cave 4”. Revue de Qumrân19 (3): 401-422. 
Fox, Michael V. (1940). Character and Ideology in the Book of Esther, Columbia, S.C: University of South Carolina Press.
Glassner, Jean‐Jacques. (2021). “The Interplay of Languages and Communication”. In: Jacobs Bruno and Rollinger Robert (ed) A Companion to The Achaemenid Persian Empire, Volume I. USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Hallock, T. Richard. (1969). Persepolis fortification tablets. Chicago: The University of Chicago press. 
Harper, Robert Francis. (1893). “The Decipherment of the Assyrio-Babylonian Inscriptions I”. The Biblical World 1 (4): 294-297.
Henkelman, F. M. Wouter & Stolper, W. Matthew. (2009). “Ethnic Identity and ethnic Labelling at Persepolis: The Case of the Skudrians”. In: Briant, Pierre and Chauveau M (ed) Organisation des pouvoirs et contacts culturels dans les pays de l’empire achéménide (Persika 14). Paris: De Boccard, 271-329.
Herodotus. (1920). Histories. English translation by A.D. Godley, Herodotus (In Four Volumes).  America and Great Britain: The Loeb Classical Library.
Hinz, Walther. (1976). Darius und die Perser: E. Kulturgeschichte d. Achämeniden, Vol 2. Holle: Baden-Baden. 
Hoschander, Jacob. (1918). “The Book of Esther in the Light of History”. The Jewish Quarterly Review 9(1/2): 1-41.
Imanpour, Mohammad-Taqhi. (2009). “A Study of the Political position of Achaemenid Satrapies during the Reign of Darius the Great, based on Inscriptions”, Iran History 61(5): 23-54.     
Johnson, Sara. R. (2005). “Novelistic Elements in Esther: Persian or Hellenistic, Jewish or Greek?”. The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 67(4): 571-589. 
Justinus. (1853). Epitome of Pompeius Trogus’ Philippic Histories. English Translation by J.S.Watson. London: Henry G. Bohn.
Kent, Roland. G. (1953). Old Persian: grammar, texts, lexico. New Haven, Connecticut: American Oriental Society.
Lecoq, Pierre. (1997). Les inscriptions de la Perse achéménide. Paris: Gallimard publishing, L’aube des peoples.
Moore, Carey A. (1971). The Anchor Bible: Esther, A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary, Volume 7B. New York: Doubleday Publication.
Milik J. T. (1992). “Les Modèles Araméens du Livre d’Esther dans la Grotte 4 de Qumrân”. Revue de Qumrân 15 (3): 321-399.
Olmstead, Albert Ten Eyck. (1959). History of The Persian Empire. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Plutarch. (1927). Moralia. English translation by Harold North Fowler. London: Harvard University Press.
Rainey, A. F. (1969). “The Satrapy Beyond the River”. Australian Journal of Biblical Archeology 1(2): 51-78. 
Ridling, Zaine. (1989). The Bible (New Revised Standard Version). USA: Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America.
Schmitt, Rüdiger. (1994). “Dāta”. In: Encyclopaedia Iranica, Vol VII, Fasc. 1, 114-115. 
Seidl, Ursula. (1999). “Ein Monument Darius’ I aus Babylon”. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und Vorderasiatische Archäologie 89(1): 101-114. 
Stiehl, Ruth. (1956). “Das Buch Esther”. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 53: 4-22. 
Torrey, Charles. C. (1944). “The Older Book of Esther”, The Harvard Theological Review 37 (1): 1-40. 
Tuplin, Christopher. (1987). “The Administration of the Achaemenid Empire”. In: Carradice I(ed). Coinage and Administration in the Athenian and Persian Empires. Oxford, 109-66.
Vanderhooft, D. (2003). “From Neo-Babylonian to Achaemenid Administration”. In: Alberts Rainer, Becking Bob (ed). Yahwism after the Exile: Perspectives on Israelite Religion in the Persian Era. Netherlands: Koninklijke Van Gorcum.
Wiesehöfer, Josef. (1991). “PRTRK, RB ḤYL’, SGN UND MR Zur Verwaltung SÜdägyptens in achaimendischer Zeit”. In: Sancisi-Weerdenburg Hellen, Kuhrt Amelie and Cool Root Margaret (ed). Achaemenid History VI: Asia Minor and Egypt: Old Cultures in a New Empire. Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten.
Xenophon. (1914). Cyropaedia. English translation by Walter Miller, USA: Harvard University Press.
Xenophon. (1998). Anabasis. English translation by Carleton L. Brownson, USA: Harvard University Press.